Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique ; 2022.
Article in French | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-2095021

ABSTRACT

Résumé Introduction La maladie d’Alzheimer et les maladies apparentées entraînent des troubles de l’humeur et des troubles anxieux chez les résidents institutionnalisés. La thérapie par réminiscence a démontré un intérêt dans le traitement de ces symptômes. Objectif L’étude pilote randomisée « Réminiscences et Émotions » utilise la réalité virtuelle personnalisée pour diminuer les troubles de l’humeur des résidents. Les objectifs secondaires visent à évaluer l’acceptabilité du dispositif et la qualité de vie des résidents. Méthode Monsieur G. présente des troubles cognitifs modérés ainsi que des troubles de l’humeur. Il participe à dix séances de réalité virtuelle personnalisée pendant une période de six semaines. Les variables sont mesurées en amont et à la fin du protocole. Résultats Une analyse visuelle des scores illustre les résultats. Le dispositif de réalité virtuelle est accepté et toléré par le participant. Les scores aux échelles de l’humeur (dépression, apathie) et de l’anxiété diminuent. Aucune différence n’apparaît sur l’échelle de qualité de vie. Les interventions génèrent du plaisir et de la vivacité en lien avec l’émergence de souvenirs positifs. Conclusion Il existe un intérêt de la thérapie par réminiscence en réalité virtuelle pour améliorer l’humeur du participant. Les futurs résultats permettront de conclure sur la méthode et son indication thérapeutique en institution gériatrique. Introduction The World Health Organization defined dementia as a syndrome in which there is deterioration in cognitive function beyond what might be expected from the usual consequences of biological aging. Currently, 55 million people live with Alzheimer's in the world. Unfortunately, there isn’t any drug treatment to cure the degenerative disease although clinical trials are promising regarding the use of monoclonal antibodies. But, Alzheimer's disease and associated diseases lead to behavioral and psychological symptoms (anxiety, apathy, depression) which can be frequent in nursing homes. In the context of pandemic, these conditions are amplified because of the sanitary restrictions. Since the beginning of the sars-cov2 pandemic, residents have felt alone, sad and more anxious. Nowadays, non-drug interventions are recommended by health organizations for the treatment of behavioral and mood disorders in the elderly with cognitive disorders. Reminiscence therapy is a non drug intervention which has been shown to be effective in the treatment of mood disorders on elderly. Many nursing homes use this non pharmacological treatment for their residents. Some studies take interest in reminiscence and virtual reality. The use of new technologies is innovative in geriatric care and it can be used as a personalized support for reminiscence therapy. The “Bien Vieillir Nice 2030” Project of Nice's University Hospital supports this research on virtual reality and mood disorders in nursing homes/long term care unit. Objective The objective of this study (University Hospital of Nice, CoBTeK France) is to evaluate the effects of personalized virtual reality on reduction of mood disorders in nursing homes residents with minors and moderates neurocognitive disorders. The secondary objectives are to assess the acceptability of the device, the emotional valence and the resident's quality of life. Method A single case study is presented to illustrate reminiscences and emotions protocol. Participants are randomized into two groups: neutral versus personalized. The neutral videos consist of unknown places like random streets or public gardens while the personalized videos are known places that mattered to the residents. Places are filmed with a camera GoPro Fusion 360°. The healthcare team and families are actively involved in the research protocol. Their help is invaluable in targeting memories related to the resident's life history. A clinical psychologist specializing in gerontology is in charge of the virtual reality sessions. The t erapeutic alliance is central to our study. A humanistic method of person-centered approach allows communication with the resident to offer him to participate in the sessions. The sessions always start and end in the same way in order not to cause stress in the resident. The hardware is tested before the protocol starts, for familiarization purpose. Potential side effects related to virtual reality are identified using a cybermalaise questionnaire. The sessions are held in a sitting position for the participant's safety. In this paper, Mr. G, 92 years old benefits from personalized video according to his life story. He has moderate cognitive impairment as well as mood disorders. He received ten virtual reality sessions over a period of six weeks. The exposure time varies between five to ten minutes. We use an Oculus Rift S headset and a computer in partnership with C2Care. Variables were measured before and at the end of the protocol. We performed a visual analysis of the scores. Results The results indicated a decrease on mood rating scales scores (Geriatric Depression Scale, Apathy Inventory, Neuropsychiatric Inventory and Hamilton Depression Rating scale). The interventions produced pleasure and alertness in connection along with the emergence of positive memories. The headset was well tolerated by the participant, but we did not observe any effect on quality of life. Conclusion There is an interest in the use of reminiscence therapy using virtual reality to improve participants’ mood. Future results will allow us to conclude on the method and on its indication in nursing homes after the inclusion of 30 participants.

2.
Maturitas ; 161: 40-43, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1889670

ABSTRACT

We assessed the impact of malnutrition on 14-day, 28-day, and 3-month mortality risk in oldest-old inpatients aged ≥80 years with COVID-19 in the hospital-based GERIA-COVID cohort. Malnutrition was assessed on hospital admission using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). Potential confounders were age, sex, functional abilities, number of acute health issues, CRP level, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, malignancies, use of antibiotics, and respiratory treatments. Seventy-eight participants (88.9 ± 4.3 years old, 55% women) were included. Of these, 82.1% had survived at day 14, 78.2% at day 28, and 70.5% after 3 months. No association between malnutrition according to the GNRI and 14-day (P = 0.324), 28-day (P = 0.166), or 3-month mortality (P = 0.109) was found. Thus, malnutrition according to the GNRI was not associated with mortality within the first 3 months of diagnosis of COVID-19 among oldest-old inpatients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Malnutrition , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Malnutrition/complications , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , Risk Factors
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(3): 490-494, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1060466

ABSTRACT

The objective of this national French survey was to determine the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) semiology in seniors (n = 353; mean, 84.7 ±â€…7.0 years). A total of 57.8% of patients exhibited ≤3 symptoms, including thermal dysregulation (83.6%), cough (58.9%), asthenia (52.7%), polypnea (39.9%), and gastrointestinal signs (24.4%). Patients ≥80 years exhibited falls (P = .002) and asthenia (P = .002). Patients with neurocognitive disorders exhibited delirium (P < .001) and altered consciousness (P = .001). Clinical peculiarities of COVID-19 were reported in seniors. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04343781.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , Coronavirus , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , France , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Nutrients ; 13(1)2020 Dec 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1016212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vitamin K concentrations are inversely associated with the clinical severity of COVID-19. The objective of this cohort study was to determine whether the regular use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) prior to COVID-19 was associated with short-term mortality in frail older adults hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: Eighty-two patients consecutively hospitalized for COVID-19 in a geriatric acute care unit were included. The association of the regular use of VKA prior to COVID-19 with survival after 7 days of COVID-19 was examined using a propensity-score-weighted Cox proportional-hazards model accounting for age, sex, severe undernutrition, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, prior stroke and/or transient ischemic attack, CHA2DS2-VASc score, HAS-BLED score, and eGFR. RESULTS: Among 82 patients (mean ± SD age 88.8 ± 4.5 years; 48% women), 73 survived COVID-19 at day 7 while 9 died. There was no between-group difference at baseline, despite a trend for more frequent use of VKA in those who did not survive on day 7 (33.3% versus 8.2%, p = 0.056). While considering "using no VKA" as the reference (hazard ratio (HR) = 1), the HR for 7-day mortality in those regularly using VKA was 5.68 [95% CI: 1.17; 27.53]. Consistently, COVID-19 patients using VKA on a regular basis had shorter survival times than the others (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Regular use of VKA was associated with increased mortality at day 7 in hospitalized frail elderly patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Frail Elderly , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Vitamin K , Age Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Survival Rate , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Vitamin K/blood
6.
Nutrients ; 13(1):39, 2021.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-984590

ABSTRACT

Background. Vitamin K concentrations are inversely associated with the clinical severity of COVID-19. The objective of this cohort study was to determine whether the regular use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) prior to COVID-19 was associated with short-term mortality in frail older adults hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods. Eighty-two patients consecutively hospitalized for COVID-19 in a geriatric acute care unit were included. The association of the regular use of VKA prior to COVID-19 with survival after 7 days of COVID-19 was examined using a propensity-score-weighted Cox proportional-hazards model accounting for age, sex, severe undernutrition, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, prior stroke and/or transient ischemic attack, CHA2DS2-VASc score, HAS-BLED score, and eGFR. Results. Among 82 patients (mean ± SD age 88.8 ± 4.5 years;48% women), 73 survived COVID-19 at day 7 while 9 died. There was no between-group difference at baseline, despite a trend for more frequent use of VKA in those who did not survive on day 7 (33.3% versus 8.2%, p = 0.056). While considering “using no VKA” as the reference (hazard ratio (HR) = 1), the HR for 7-day mortality in those regularly using VKA was 5.68 [95% CI: 1.17;27.53]. Consistently, COVID-19 patients using VKA on a regular basis had shorter survival times than the others (p = 0.031). Conclusions. Regular use of VKA was associated with increased mortality at day 7 in hospitalized frail elderly patients with COVID-19.

7.
Nutrients ; 12(11)2020 Nov 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-921214

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this quasi-experimental study was to determine whether bolus vitamin D supplementation taken either regularly over the preceding year or after the diagnosis of COVID-19 was effective in improving survival among hospitalized frail elderly COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients consecutively hospitalized for COVID-19 in a geriatric unit were included. Intervention groups were participants regularly supplemented with vitamin D over the preceding year (Group 1), and those supplemented with vitamin D after COVID-19 diagnosis (Group 2). The comparator group involved participants having received no vitamin D supplements (Group 3). Outcomes were 14-day mortality and highest (worst) score on the ordinal scale for clinical improvement (OSCI) measured during COVID-19 acute phase. Potential confounders were age, gender, functional abilities, undernutrition, cancer, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, glycated hemoglobin, number of acute health issues at admission, hospital use of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and pharmacological treatments of respiratory disorders. RESULTS: The three groups (n = 77; mean ± SD, 88 ± 5years; 49% women) were similar at baseline (except for woman proportion, p = 0.02), as were the treatments used for COVID-19. In Group 1 (n = 29), 93.1% of COVID-19 participants survived at day 14, compared to 81.2% survivors in Group 2 (n = 16) (p = 0.33) and 68.7% survivors in Group 3 (n = 32) (p = 0.02). While considering Group 3 as reference (hazard ratio (HR) = 1), the fully-adjusted HR for 14-day mortality was HR = 0.07 (p = 0.017) for Group 1 and HR = 0.37 (p = 0.28) for Group 2. Group 1 had longer survival time than Group 3 (log-rank p = 0.015), although there was no difference between Groups 2 and 3 (log-rank p = 0.32). Group 1, but not Group 2 (p = 0.40), was associated with lower risk of OSCI score ≥5 compared to Group 3 (odds ratio = 0.08, p= 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Regular bolus vitamin D supplementation was associated with less severe COVID-19 and better survival in frail elderly.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Dietary Supplements , Frailty/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Frailty/blood , Frailty/virology , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Survival Rate , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
8.
Nutrients ; 12(11):3377, 2020.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-896153

ABSTRACT

Background. The objective of this quasi-experimental study was to determine whether bolus vitamin D supplementation taken either regularly over the preceding year or after the diagnosis of COVID-19 was effective in improving survival among hospitalized frail elderly COVID-19 patients. Methods. Seventy-seven patients consecutively hospitalized for COVID-19 in a geriatric unit were included. Intervention groups were participants regularly supplemented with vitamin D over the preceding year (Group 1), and those supplemented with vitamin D after COVID-19 diagnosis (Group 2). The comparator group involved participants having received no vitamin D supplements (Group 3). Outcomes were 14-day mortality and highest (worst) score on the ordinal scale for clinical improvement (OSCI) measured during COVID-19 acute phase. Potential confounders were age, gender, functional abilities, undernutrition, cancer, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, glycated hemoglobin, number of acute health issues at admission, hospital use of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and pharmacological treatments of respiratory disorders. Results. The three groups (n = 77;mean ±SD, 88 ±5years;49% women) were similar at baseline (except for woman proportion, p = 0.02), as were the treatments used for COVID-19. In Group 1 (n = 29), 93.1% of COVID-19 participants survived at day 14, compared to 81.2% survivors in Group 2 (n = 16) (p = 0.33) and 68.7% survivors in Group 3 (n = 32) (p = 0.02). While considering Group 3 as reference (hazard ratio (HR) = 1), the fully-adjusted HR for 14-day mortality was HR = 0.07 (p = 0.017) for Group 1 and HR = 0.37 (p = 0.28) for Group 2. Group 1 had longer survival time than Group 3 (log-rank p = 0.015), although there was no difference between Groups 2 and 3 (log-rank p = 0.32). Group 1, but not Group 2 (p = 0.40), was associated with lower risk of OSCI score ≥5 compared to Group 3 (odds ratio = 0.08, p= 0.03). Conclusions. Regular bolus vitamin D supplementation was associated with less severe COVID-19 and better survival in frail elderly.

9.
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil ; 18(2): 135-139, 2020 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-879233

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic affects older adults particularly severely. Our objective was to identify from the international literature the symptoms most commonly experienced by older adults infected with SARS-CoV-2. This systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE between 1 December 2019 and 13 April 2020. The methodological quality analysis used a method dedicated to case series and case reports. Of the 260 articles initially identified, only two studies were ultimately included in the qualitative analysis. The mean age was relatively low, between 71 and 74 years on average. COVID-19 symptoms were as follows: fever, dry cough, dyspnoea, asthenia, anorexia, chest tightness, diarrhoea and, to a lesser extent, myalgia, pharyngitis, nausea, dizziness, headache, abdominal pain, and vomiting. Lymphopenia was noted from complete blood counts. In conclusion, this systematic review of the international literature reveals a lack of data about the semiology of COVID-19 in older adults, especially in very elderly frail people, who are normally considered to constitute the geriatric population. The national survey conducted by the Société Française de Gériatrie et Gérontologie will help bridge this semiological gap.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Frail Elderly , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology
10.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 12(1): 193-204, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-871610

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The United Nations (UN) has published a Policy Brief on the impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) that identifies policies and responses to protect older adults. Our objective was to summarize actions, health policies and clinical guidelines adopted by six European countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Poland, Spain and United Kingdom) during the pandemic, and to assess the impact of national policies on reducing adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in older populations. METHODS: Reports by geriatricians on the measures and actions undertaken by governmental institutions in each country between March and July 2020, as well as the role of primary care during the pandemic, covered three areas: (a) general health strategies related to the pandemic; (b) impact of COVID-19 on health inequity; and (c) initiatives and challenges for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. RESULTS: In the six countries, COVID-19 mortality in nursing homes ranged from 26 to 66%. Although all countries endorsed the World Health Organization general recommendations, the reports identified the lack of harmonized European guidelines and policies for nursing homes, with competencies transferred to national (or regional) governments. All countries restricted visits in nursing homes, but no specific action plans were provided. The role of primary care was limited by the centralization of the crisis in hospital settings. CONCLUSIONS: The older population has been greatly affected by COVID-19 and by the policies initiated to control its spread. The right to health and dignity are transgenerational; chronological age should not be the sole criterion in policy decisions.


Subject(s)
Ageism , COVID-19 , Health Policy , Health Services Needs and Demand , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Europe , Geriatrics , Humans , Nursing Homes , Pandemics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2
12.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 8(9): e21845, 2020 09 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-781815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Technological communication methods such as telephone calls and video calls can help prevent social isolation and loneliness in frail older adults during confinement. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to determine which virtual communication method (ie, telephone call or video call) was preferred by confined older hospital patients and nursing home residents and the variables influencing this preference. METHODS: The TOVID (Telephony Or Videophony for Isolated elDerly) study was a cross-sectional study that was designed to examine the preference between telephone calls and video calls among frail older adults who were either hospitalized in a geriatric acute care unit or institutionalized in a long-term care and nursing home during the COVID-19 confinement period. RESULTS: A total of 132 older people were surveyed between March 25 and May 11, 2020 (mean age 88.2 years, SD 6.2); 79 (59.8%) were women. Patients hospitalized in the geriatric acute care unit were more able to establish communication independently than residents institutionalized in the long-term care and nursing home (P=.03) and were more satisfied with their communication experiences (P=.02). Overall, older people tended to favor telephone calls (73/132, 55.3%) over video calls (59/132, 44.7%); however, their satisfaction degree was similar regardless of the chosen method (P=.1), with no effect of age (P=.97) or gender (P=.2). In the geriatric acute care unit, the satisfaction degrees were similar for telephone calls (40/41, 98%) and video calls (33/38, 87%) in older patients (P=.10). Conversely, in the long-term care and nursing home, residents were more satisfied with the use of video calls to communicate with their relatives (14/15, 93%) versus the use of telephone calls (6/12, 50%; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Older people confined to health care settings were able to complete telephone calls more independently than video calls, and they tended to use telephone calls more often than video calls. The satisfaction degrees were similar with both modalities and even greater with video calls among long-term care and nursing home residents when they were given assistance to establish communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04333849: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04333849.


Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Frail Elderly/psychology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Social Isolation , Telephone , Videoconferencing , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization , Humans , Loneliness , Male , Nursing Homes , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology
13.
Maturitas ; 141: 46-52, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-623282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 epidemic is particularly serious in older adults. The symptomatology and epidemic profile remain little known in this population, especially in disabled oldest-old people with chronic diseases living in nursing homes. The objective of the present study was to comprehensively describe symptoms and chronological aspects of the diffusion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a nursing home, among both residents and caregivers. DESIGN: Five-week retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A middle-sized nursing home in Maine-et-Loire, west of France. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-seven frail older residents (87.9 ± 7.2years; 71 % female) and 92 staff members (38.3 ± 11.7years; 89 % female) were included. MEASUREMENTS: Mass screening for SARS-CoV-2 was performed in both residents and staff. Attack rate, mortality rate, and symptoms among residents and staff infected with SARS-CoV-2 were recorded. RESULTS: The attack rate of COVID-19 was 47 % in residents (case fatality rate, 27 %), and 24 % in staff. Epidemic curves revealed that the epidemic started in residents before spreading to caregivers. Residents exhibited both general and respiratory signs (59 % hyperthermia, 49 % cough, 42 % polypnea) together with geriatric syndromes (15 % falls, 10 % altered consciousness). The classification tree revealed 100 % COVID-19 probability in the following groups: i) residents younger than 90 with dyspnea and falls; ii) residents older than 90 with anorexia; iii) residents older than 90 without anorexia but with altered consciousness. Finally, 41 % of staff members diagnosed with COVID-19 were asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: The pauci-symptomatic expression of COVID-19 in older residents, together with the high prevalence of asymptomatic forms in caregivers, justifies mass screening in nursing homes, possibly prioritizing residents with suggestive combinations of clinical signs including dyspnea, falls, anorexia and/or altered consciousness.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Homes for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Accidental Falls , Aged, 80 and over , Anorexia/virology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Caregivers , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Dyspnea/virology , Female , Frail Elderly , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL